WWE Spoilers WWE Rumors WWE Results WWE Divas TNA Wrestling Forums


Reply to Post Reply to Post

WWE/TNA feud

  1. Adam B
    Guest

    With several sources saying that TNA will be extended to 2 hours on tv by the end of September you have to think that TNA in no sense is backing down from WWE. Several wrestlers for TNA have said that they do in fact beleive that in the future they will be able to compete with the WWE.And with the WWE having so much problems with steroid alligations , several releases, and even decline in ratings, dont count out TNA yet!

    Posted 9/3/2007 12:05:04 PM #
  2. big_d_gribble
    Guest

    A TNA/WWE fued is definatly possible, but TNA needs to get thier business in order before they can compete head to head. TNA is getting better talent, but they don't know how to utilize them properly because of poor writing talent. TNA is also overfixated on drama. They have to keep focusing on the quality of thier matches, because that gets people's attention better than trivial crap like signing a useless Pacman Jones to thier roster. The X division is the best weapon that TNA would have in the fued and they keep ignoring them in favor of has been WCW stars.

    Posted 9/3/2007 1:22:38 PM #
  3. Adam B
    Guest

    Yeah I would defitnatley agree that its not mostly about the wrestling matches and it needs to be. Signing Pacman even though he couldent wrestle was stupid, they thought that it would attract peoples attention but that week the ratings actually declined. I see WWE as the clear winner as of now because they have better talent and even though I dont neccisarily like the way Mcmahon does it he is still better then TNA's management. And yeah as you said the X Division matches are the best that TNA has to offer i jsut watched one it was from a alst year's PPV LAX vs. Chris Daniels and AJ Styles pretty sick match, they deff need one of those once a month.

    Posted 9/4/2007 4:22:24 PM #
  4. DX4LIfe
    Guest

    TNA will never get it right. The sign people before they realize the consequences. Pacman might be a disadvantage to them considering he has no popularity and he probably sux as a wrestler.

    Posted 9/13/2007 4:14:07 PM #
  5. big_d_gribble
    Guest

    We will never know if he is a good wrestler or not because he can't do anything physical. At least we know he sux on the mic. His best lines so far has been 'yeah' and 'maybe'. That pacman spray paint actis lame, WCW should sue his ass!

    Posted 9/13/2007 7:29:35 PM #
  6. Aaron
    Guest

    do u relly belive tna can compare to wwe. thats liken rey mysterio aginst andre the giant theres no way tna will get as big as wwe

    Posted 9/14/2007 5:19:51 PM #
  7. frisbee
    Guest

    www.wrestlingsigns.com  the first site dedicated to the fans

    Posted 10/19/2007 7:43:12 PM #
Total Posts: 7

You are not logged in. You are posting as a guest. Click here to login. Click here to register.

Your Name:

Your E-mail: (will NOT be published)

Reply: